| |
Let
us look at another aspect of these well-known words from our Declaration
of Independence:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty
, and the pursuit of
Happiness.”
I did not just make up those
words “pursuit of Happiness” out of the blue. We in the Continental
Congress had talked about them for months. John Locke had written in 1690
in his Second Treatise about the mutual preservation of lives, liberty and
property. We chose not to use “property” in our Declaration of
Independence, however, because slaves were considered property, and we did
not want to say that our Creator granted owners such property. Thus we
used Life,
Liberty
and the pursuit of
Happiness. Human rights were more important to us than property rights. We
did not abolish slavery in the Declaration, and for that we can be
faulted. But at least we were able to affirm the pursuit of Happiness as a
national goal, instead of the right to own property, especially human
property.
What did we mean by the “pursuit of Happiness?” We Founders had varied
opinions about what constituted happiness. Was it material basics that
would bring happiness? Or extravagant material wealth? Or having a family?
Or having a decentralized government? Or having a country where the
Christian religion would be central to governance? Or the separation of
church and state? Or the happiness of learning? We had many different
interpretations of happiness then, and no doubt there are just as many
interpretations today throughout the land, which is to be expected in our
democracy.
At the time of the Revolution, we needed to be direct and forceful in
expressing our need to pursue our own national happiness and independence.
Our power at that time was limited, compared to the power of several
countries in the world. But today we are the only superpower, so our
decisions about our own happiness have great impact on people everywhere
on earth. For example, at the Earth Summit in
Brazil
in 1992, our country was
asked to join with the rest of the world to seriously tackle the
environmental degradation of earth that science was showing to be a
reality. After many months of education and negotiations before the Earth
Summit, and after two weeks of intense work at the Earth Summit itself,
President George H.W. Bush said the bottom line is that the American
lifestyle is not up for negotiation. In other words, we will go along with
the rest of the world only to the extent that our own happiness is not
compromised, however we choose to define our happiness. I suspect that
this attitude we expressed through our President comes at least in part
from the use of “pursuit of Happiness” in the Declaration of
Independence. My own opinion is that our country missed an opportunity at
the Earth Summit for Americans to show that the happiness of others, and
of the earth as well, is as important as our own happiness.
Presidents throughout our history, Republican and Democratic alike, have
used the phrase “pursuit of Happiness” to help gain support for war.
Current President George W. Bush said on June 18, 2002,
“We don’t conquer peoples; we liberate people, because we hold
true to our values of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” But
the question must always be asked, whose happiness are we talking about,
ours or the people we are liberating? Happiness as a goal depends also on
the other country’s perceptions, desires, expectations, religions,
educational levels, and a myriad of other factors. I seriously doubt that
we have taken enough of these factors into consideration in this current
war on terror, and thus the line between conquering and “liberating for
happiness” is considerably blurred at this time. We need a better
understanding of our “enemy,” or we become our own worst enemy.
I think about what makes me most happy. It is when I do something loving
for someone, or they do something loving for me. Regardless of what task I
might be working on, if during the process of it, during the pursuit, I
treat someone with compassion, caring, love, give them food and shelter,
then I feel happy myself. I know this sounds pretty simple, but maybe it
is that simple. I think that over the past few decades our country has
sometimes forgotten that what will make us happy and secure as a nation is
to treat the rest of the world with compassion, love, generosity,
understanding, and dignity. Of course, there are also times when we must
defend ourselves, even with force, in order to continue to have the
opportunity of realizing our own happiness, and extending happiness to
others. There is that old saying that if you wish to offer the tiger
peace, you must first restrain him, or be eaten in the process. I think
that we have gotten the restraint part of the balance down pat, but we
haven’t done so well over the past few years on the other part, seeing
the need to cooperate with the rest of the world in simple and sensible
and peaceful ways. We seem to be hung up on independence when cooperation
has been needed, and we have focused on our own pursuit of happiness as a
goal instead of a process that includes others, and this behavior has
greatly lessened our own national security.
Perhaps we Founders should have written “Happiness of pursuit.” Maybe
we had it backwards. Perhaps happiness is found in the process of pursuing
life, and depends on how we treat others during the pursuit, rather than
on some goal of happiness in the future. I believe that God is happy, not
angry, and thus God could not create that which is not happy as well. God
couldn’t create us as less than happy, with a goal of someday being
happy at the end of our long pursuit. What kind of God would create us to
spend our lives, or many lifetimes even, pursuing happiness in a world or
universe that provides us with so many examples of lack of happiness? I
now believe that our Creator does not give us the pursuit of happiness,
but actually gives us happiness from the start, even if we do not
recognize this happiness, moment by moment. The happiness that we were
given is eternal, and comes from the fact that we are all powerful, loving
creators ourselves, and we are capable of realizing that happiness here
and now, as individuals and as nations. I know this sounds idealistic and
impractical, which was a criticism of me occasionally back in
Revolutionary days as well, but I still trust that we humans are
inherently good, and our goodness can be exhibited in each moment, happily
so. I hope that we can all reflect back on the principles stated in the
Declaration of Independence and see the Golden Rule assumed there also,
and thus as a nation seek to honor and promote the happiness of all
beings.
|
|